I am currently in the process of designing a finite space.Within this space I picked specific areas of knowledge and used some of the TS tools. I’ve been thinking about not showing the exterior form of the space but rather concentrating on the infinite connections is has with other spaces, areas of information etc….maybe linking it to different scales and other spaces, trough a model and script.
Some more thoughts :
There are 2 strategic scores that Im looking at:
Architecture is about the materialization of infinite ideas.
The practice aims to constantly define the spectrum of the infinite within the finite.
By emphasizing on the notion of the infinite as a necessity in our finite world.
Bringing a piece of the universe in the space. How can a space make you travel in time and space? The space itself has the power to materialize and embed infinite knowledge.
Very inspired by Buckminster fuller, the strategy starts with bluesky architectural research and belief. Blue sky thinking as the fuel for progress where we constantly seek for the unknown. Used as a research method and the starting point of all projects. Blue sky a theoretical threshold between the infinite and the finite and a space of the infinite imagination of the mind.
– One score of the METHODOLOGY of the practice.
-Evolution in time
by looking at emergent materials and technologies discoveries with infinite properties
Learning from Borges, In order to talk an infinite space, The practice believes in the tension between philosophy and narrative.
On a lighter note, some images of the Easter sky 🙂